patrio

For Christmas I got an interesting present from a good friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few simple prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, however it's also a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, kenpoguy.com considering that rotating from assembling AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who developed it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in any person's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to expand his range, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI -generated items to human customers.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound simply like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually indicate human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI -generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and wiki.rrtn.org they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for creative functions ought to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without permission need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective but let's develop it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to use creators' material on the web to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of happiness," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest performing markets on the unclear pledge of growth."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them license their material, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national information library containing public information from a large range of sources will also be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to want the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of factors which can make up fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for cadizpedia.wikanda.es a portion of the price of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather difficult to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm not sure how long I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.